Tyrone R. Hartsfield v. State of Florida
This text of Tyrone R. Hartsfield v. State of Florida (Tyrone R. Hartsfield v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D19-1074 _____________________________
TYRONE R. HARTSFIELD,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
May 7, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.
MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Tyrone R. Hartsfield, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tyrone R. Hartsfield v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyrone-r-hartsfield-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.