TYRONE LUCK vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 2023·No. 23-0113·Published

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D23-113

LT Case No. 2022 MM 1255

TYRONE LUCK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court for Duval County. Gary Flower, Judge.

Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

October 20, 2023

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Tyrone Luck’s judgment and sentence. We remand, however, for the trial court to identify the

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

statutory authority for costs imposed in his judgment and sentence. “The statutory authority for all costs imposed, whether they are mandatory or discretionary, must be cited in the written order.” Johnson v. State, 322 So. 3d 243 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (quoting Garrett v. State, 262 So. 3d 267, 267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

WALLIS, HARRIS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TYRONE LUCK vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

TYRONE LUCK vs STATE OF FLORIDA (TYRONE LUCK vs STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Garrett v. State
262 So. 3d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)