Tyrone Berry v. State
This text of Tyrone Berry v. State (Tyrone Berry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed December 11, 2014.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00844-CR ____________
TYRONE BERRY, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 180th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1019634
ORDER
On April 28, 2014, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant was provided a copy of the record and has been granted three extensions of time to file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. On December 8, 2014, appellant filed a pro se motion seeking to suspend the application of the rule limiting briefs and responses to 50 pages, which is now found in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(2) (amendments eff. Jan. 1, 2014). We GRANT the motion and ORDER that appellant may file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief of not more than 65 pages in length. Appellant’s pro se response shall be due January 12, 2015. No further extensions of time shall be granted.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tyrone Berry v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyrone-berry-v-state-texapp-2014.