Tyrone Arthur Williams v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, the State of Maryland, Respondent

831 F.2d 1058, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13844, 1987 WL 38155
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1987
Docket87-6572
StatusUnpublished

This text of 831 F.2d 1058 (Tyrone Arthur Williams v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, the State of Maryland, Respondent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyrone Arthur Williams v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, the State of Maryland, Respondent, 831 F.2d 1058, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13844, 1987 WL 38155 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

831 F.2d 1058
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Tyrone Arthur WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, Maryland House of Correction, the State of Maryland,
Respondent- Appellee.

No. 87-6572.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 31, 1987.
Decided Oct. 16, 1987.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, District Judge. (C/A No. 868-3428-HM).

Tyrone Arthur Williams, appellant pro se.

J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Jillyn Kaberle Schulze, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Warden, C/A No. 86-3428-HM (D.Md., April 21, 1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 F.2d 1058, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13844, 1987 WL 38155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyrone-arthur-williams-v-warden-maryland-house-of--ca4-1987.