Tyron Marquiss Harris v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 26, 2024
DocketA24D0206
StatusPublished

This text of Tyron Marquiss Harris v. State (Tyron Marquiss Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyron Marquiss Harris v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 26, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0206. TYRON MARQUISS HARRIS v. THE STATE.

Tyron Marquiss Harris filed in the trial court a pro se motion to modify sentence. On August 9, 2023, the court entered an order dismissing the motion, explaining that it had ruled already on a previous motion to modify sentence. Harris filed this discretionary application on November 22, 2023, in the Supreme Court of Georgia, which transferred the application to this Court. We lack jurisdiction. To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Here, Harris’s application was filed 105 days after entry of the August 9, 2023 order.1 Because Harris’s application for discretionary appeal is untimely, we lack jurisdiction to consider the application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

C our t of Appeals of the State of G eorgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/26/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 In his application, Harris indicates that he wishes to appeal a trial court order entered on August 21, 2023. However, he has not included with his application any such order, and his application also would be untimely as to an August 21, 2023 order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyle v. State of Georgia
380 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tyron Marquiss Harris v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyron-marquiss-harris-v-state-gactapp-2024.