Tyrese Dionte Sears v. State
Opinion
Motion Granted; Order filed February 4, 2020
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-19-00804-CR
TYRESE DIONTE SEARS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 358th District Court Ector County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. D-17-1992-CR
ORDER
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 358th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before 15 days from the date of this order; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tyrese Dionte Sears v. State (Tyrese Dionte Sears v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.