Tyre v. Wright

Supreme Court of Florida

Tyre v. Wright

1 So. 2d 636, 146 Fla. 665, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1208

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tyre v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 Fla. 90 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 18, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the Court having considered the assignments of error and cross assignments of error and finding no harmful error in the record; it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that said decree is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the Court having considered the assignments of error and cross assignments of error and finding no harmful error in the record; it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that said decree is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.

Tyre v. Wright, 1 So. 2d 636, 146 Fla. 665, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1208 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

1 So. 2d 636 (Tyre v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.