Tyre v. State

140 S.E. 527, 37 Ga. App. 376, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 690
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1927·No. 18377·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. Under the principle of the ruling in Eidson v. State, 21 Ga. App. 244, the alleged error in the charge of the court, complained of in ground 1 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, does not require a new trial.

2. Under the facts of the ease the failure of the court to instruct the jury upon the law of involuntary manslaughter was not error.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloockvorih, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyre v. State, 140 S.E. 527, 37 Ga. App. 376, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 690 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

140 S.E. 527 (Tyre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. State
92 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Barnes v. State
29 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Crosby v. State
158 S.E. 633 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)