TyQuisha N. Davis v. 2 Equines
Opinion
Opinion issued December 12, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
on Section 821.025(e) of the Texas Health and Safety Code. Appellant did not respond. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
Section 821.025 permits an owner, who has been divested of ownership of an animal, to appeal that order to the county court or county court at law. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 821.025(a). The decision of the county court at law “is final and may not be further appealed.” Id. § 821.025(e); see Madison v. Harris County, No. 01-17-00675-CV, 2017 WL 4414035, at * 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 5, 2017, no pet.) (dismissing attempted appeal from county court at law order on trial de novo of right to possession of animals under Section 821.023 because no appeal is permitted under Section 821.025(e)).
Accordingly, because appellant is prohibited by statute from appealing the County Court at Law order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
TyQuisha N. Davis v. 2 Equines (TyQuisha N. Davis v. 2 Equines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.