Tyquan Guzman v. State
This text of Tyquan Guzman v. State (Tyquan Guzman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 3, 2018
NO. 03-18-00054-CR
Tyquan Guzman, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s
judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication
of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00055-CR
APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s
judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication
of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00056-CR
APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s
judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication
of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tyquan Guzman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyquan-guzman-v-state-texapp-2018.