Typo Realty Corp. v. Greenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Typo Realty Corp. v. Greenbaum

75 A.D.2d 893, 428 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11539

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 75 A.D.2d 893 (Typo Realty Corp. v. Greenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Typo Realty Corp. v. Greenbaum, 75 A.D.2d 893, 428 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 11, 1979, as denied its motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment. Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provisions which granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and substituting therefor a provision denying said cross motion. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. There are questions of fact which should be resolved at a trial. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ.,concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 11, 1979, as denied its motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment. Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provisions which granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and substituting therefor a provision denying said cross motion. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. There are questions of fact which should be resolved at a trial. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ.,concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.D.2d 893, 428 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/typo-realty-corp-v-greenbaum-nyappdiv-1980.