Tynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tynes v. State

693 So. 2d 118, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4959, 1997 WL 232248

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1997

DocketNo. 95-04736

StatusPublished

This text of 693 So. 2d 118 (Tynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tynes v. State, 693 So. 2d 118, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4959, 1997 WL 232248 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the defendant, Robert Tynes, raises three challenges to the sentence imposed upon his conviction for robbery with a firearm. The first two issues have merit. Therefore, we strike the $2.00 discretionary cost, pursuant to section 943.25, Florida Statutes (1995). See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). We also remand for entry of the restitution judgment that was orally pronounced but never entered.

The defendant also contends, for the first time on appeal, that the trial court improperly imposed a three-year minimum mandatory prison term in violation of the plea agreement. This issue is not cognizable on direct appeal because the defendant neither objected below nor moved to withdraw his plea. See Hoskins v. State, 636 So.2d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI