Tynes v. Southern Pine Co.

54 So. 885, 100 Miss. 129
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mayes, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the .-court.

There is no merit in the contention of appellant, and the decree of the court below, sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill, is correct.

. In view of section 6, article 8, of the Constitution of Mississippi of 1868, which provides “that there shall be established a common school fund, which shall consist of the proceeds of the lands now belonging to the state, heretofore granted by the United States, and of the land known as ‘swamp lands,’ except the swamp lands lying and situated on Pearl river, in the counties of Hancock, Marion, Lawrence, Simpson and Copiah,” etc., the act of 1871 could not authorize the issuance of patents to the Pearl River Navigation Company of the land which is in controversy in this suit. The. bill itself shows that the lands are not on Pearl river, and the language of the bill is even broader than this, in that the bill expressly states that the land is neither “on nor near Pearl river.” No act passed by the Legislature, in view of the article of the Constitution above referred to, could donate to anybody for any purpose land situated as was this land.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tynes v. Southern Pine Co., 54 So. 885, 100 Miss. 129 (Mich. 1911).

54 So. 885 (Tynes v. Southern Pine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. Martin
296 F. 442 (Fifth Circuit, 1924)
Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. State ex rel. Moore
97 So. 552 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)