Tynes v. Southern Pine Co.
This text of 54 So. 885 (Tynes v. Southern Pine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the .-court.
There is no merit in the contention of appellant, and the decree of the court below, sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill, is correct.
. In view of section 6, article 8, of the Constitution of Mississippi of 1868, which provides “that there shall be established a common school fund, which shall consist of the proceeds of the lands now belonging to the state, heretofore granted by the United States, and of the land known as ‘swamp lands,’ except the swamp lands lying and situated on Pearl river, in the counties of Hancock, Marion, Lawrence, Simpson and Copiah,” etc., the act of 1871 could not authorize the issuance of patents to the Pearl River Navigation Company of the land which is in controversy in this suit. The. bill itself shows that the lands are not on Pearl river, and the language of the bill is even broader than this, in that the bill expressly states that the land is neither “on nor near Pearl river.” No act passed by the Legislature, in view of the article of the Constitution above referred to, could donate to anybody for any purpose land situated as was this land.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 So. 885, 100 Miss. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tynes-v-southern-pine-co-miss-1911.