Tynes v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

LAWANNA TYNES, CASE NO. 18-62891-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

Plaintiff,

vs.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE,

Defendant. _______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees [DE 154] and the October 20, 2021 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 165]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 165] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s findings in the Report [DE 165] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 165] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusion that, in the interest of judicial economy, the Motion be denied without prejudice to renew at the time the stay of judgment is lifted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 165] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED. 1 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees [DE 154] is hereby DENIED without prejudice to renew at the time the stay of judgment is lifted. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 4th day of November, 2021.

, ? | 4 j . f Pup fz #4 v Pty 4 if ta Ci, MAGA KV VME Coe VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Magistrate Judge Snow Counsel of record