Tyner v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

232 Md. 666
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 13, 1963
DocketApp. No. 19
StatusPublished

This text of 232 Md. 666 (Tyner v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyner v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 232 Md. 666 (Md. 1963).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, petitioner complained below that he was convicted of burglary, although the evidence at the trial did not show that anything was taken. Petitioner was indicted for breaking and entering a storehouse with felonious intent, probably under Code (1962 Supp.), Art. 27, sec. 32. Such intent may be shown circumstantially, although articles of small or no value are taken. See Rahe v. State, 222 Md. 508 and McNeil v. State, 227 Md. 298. Moreover, the sufficiency of the evidence to support an indictment is not reviewable except on direct appeal. The sentence of three years is well within the statutory limits.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNeil v. State
176 A.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)
Rahe, Jr. v. State
161 A.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 Md. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyner-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1963.