Tyner v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

232 Md. 666
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 13, 1963·No. App. No. 19·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, petitioner complained below that he was convicted of burglary, although the evidence at the trial did not show that anything was taken. Petitioner was indicted for breaking and entering a storehouse with felonious intent, probably under Code (1962 Supp.), Art. 27, sec. 32. Such intent may be shown circumstantially, although articles of small or no value are taken. See Rahe v. State, 222 Md. 508 and McNeil v. State, 227 Md. 298. Moreover, the sufficiency of the evidence to support an indictment is not reviewable except on direct appeal. The sentence of three years is well within the statutory limits.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyner v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 232 Md. 666 (Md. 1963).

232 Md. 666 (Tyner v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNeil v. State
176 A.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)
Rahe, Jr. v. State
161 A.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)