Tyner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Tyner v. State

1911 OK CR 415, 117 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 634, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 409

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1911

DocketNo. A-1146.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 415 (Tyner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyner v. State, 1911 OK CR 415, 117 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 634, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 409 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 21st day of January, 1911, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the county court of Rogers county for *635 a violation of tlie prohibitory liquor law, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve six months in the county jail. The trial court did not extend the 60 days allowed by law within which appellant must perfect his apeal to this court, and appellant did not perfect his appeal to .this court until the 11th day of May, 1911, which was after the expiration of the 60 days allowed by law within which the appeal should have been perfected. This court therefore has never acquired jurisdiction of this cause and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 21st day of January, 1911, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the county court of Rogers county for *635 a violation of tlie prohibitory liquor law, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve six months in the county jail. The trial court did not extend the 60 days allowed by law within which appellant must perfect his apeal to this court, and appellant did not perfect his appeal to .this court until the 11th day of May, 1911, which was after the expiration of the 60 days allowed by law within which the appeal should have been perfected. This court therefore has never acquired jurisdiction of this cause and the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 415, 117 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 634, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyner-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.