Tyner v. State

363 So. 2d 1165, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16937
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 1978
DocketNo. KK-419
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 1165 (Tyner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyner v. State, 363 So. 2d 1165, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16937 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. Appellant contends that a substitute judge sentenced him without becoming familiar with the case and that, therefore, the sentence is invalid.

This issue could have been raised on direct appeal and, thus, cannot be raised with a motion to vacate or set aside a judgment and conviction. Von Eberstein v. State, 270 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walcott v. State
460 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
McCrae v. State
437 So. 2d 1388 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 So. 2d 1165, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyner-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.