Tyner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tyner v. State

363 So. 2d 1165, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16937

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1978·No. No. KK-419·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. Appellant contends that a substitute judge sentenced him without becoming familiar with the case and that, therefore, the sentence is invalid.

This issue could have been raised on direct appeal and, thus, cannot be raised with a motion to vacate or set aside a judgment and conviction. Von Eberstein v. State, 270 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. Appellant contends that a substitute judge sentenced him without becoming familiar with the case and that, therefore, the sentence is invalid.

This issue could have been raised on direct appeal and, thus, cannot be raised with a motion to vacate or set aside a judgment and conviction. Von Eberstein v. State, 270 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Tyner v. State, 363 So. 2d 1165, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16937 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

363 So. 2d 1165 (Tyner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related