Tyner v. Kelso

Supreme Court of Georgia

Tyner v. Kelso

391 S.E.2d 406, 260 Ga. 179

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 17, 1990

DocketS90A0699

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 S.E.2d 406 (Tyner v. Kelso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyner v. Kelso, 391 S.E.2d 406, 260 Ga. 179 (Ga. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Petitioner is an inmate at Lee Correctional Institution (Institution). He brought an action for mandamus against the Warden of the [180]*180Institution, seeking enforcement of an Institution handbook rule requiring that all stereo equipment be used with headphones or earplugs. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and petitioner filed this appeal.

Decided May 17, 1990. Curtis Tyner, pro se. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, C. LaTain Kell, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The issue raised by petitioner is one which cannot be reached judicially. However, we have every confidence that the administrators of the Institution will ensure that the handbook rule in question is enforced.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Petitioner is an inmate at Lee Correctional Institution (Institution). He brought an action for mandamus against the Warden of the [180]*180Institution, seeking enforcement of an Institution handbook rule requiring that all stereo equipment be used with headphones or earplugs. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and petitioner filed this appeal.

Decided May 17, 1990. Curtis Tyner, pro se. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, C. LaTain Kell, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The issue raised by petitioner is one which cannot be reached judicially. However, we have every confidence that the administrators of the Institution will ensure that the handbook rule in question is enforced.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 S.E.2d 406, 260 Ga. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyner-v-kelso-ga-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack