Tyner v. Hi Q Inc

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

TARA ARMADO and MAKI ) TYNER, individually and on behalf □□□ all other similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) -VS- ) Case No. CIV-21-608-F ) HI. Q, INC., d/b/a HEALTH IQ ) INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER The court is in receipt of plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint properly filed pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. As the properly filed amended pleading supersedes the original Class Action Complaint, see, Murray v. Archambo, 132 F.3d 609, 612 (10" Cir. 1998); Miller v. Glanz, 948 F.2d 1562, 1565 (10" Cir. 1991); Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10" Cir. 1990), the court DENIES as MOOT Defendant Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (doc. no. 8). IT IS SO ORDERED this 9" day of September, 2021.

STEPHEN P. FRIOT . UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21-0608p003.docx