Tyner v. Buffington

Supreme Court

Tyner v. Buffington

269 U.S. 529, 46 S. Ct. 16

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 12, 1925

DocketNo. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 269 U.S. 529 (Tyner v. Buffington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyner v. Buffington, 269 U.S. 529, 46 S. Ct. 16 (1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as [530]*530amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6. Petition for writ of certiorari herein denied.

Mr. William Neff, with whom Messrs. Robert M. Rainey and Streeter B. Flynn were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Carter Smith, with whom Mr. George S. Ramsey was on the brief, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as [530]*530amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6. Petition for writ of certiorari herein denied.

Mr. William Neff, with whom Messrs. Robert M. Rainey and Streeter B. Flynn were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Carter Smith, with whom Mr. George S. Ramsey was on the brief, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 U.S. 529, 46 S. Ct. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyner-v-buffington-scotus-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack