Tyndale v. Manufacturers Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tyndale v. Manufacturers Supply Co.

71 S.E.2d 689, 86 Ga. App. 526, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 996

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 16, 1952

Docket34037

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 S.E.2d 689 (Tyndale v. Manufacturers Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyndale v. Manufacturers Supply Co., 71 S.E.2d 689, 86 Ga. App. 526, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 996 (Ga. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, J.

1. Where a marshal’s return of service is traversed on the ground that the entry of service is not true, and he is made a party to the proceedings, and where the court below finds in favor of the return of service and the traversor excepts to that judgment without making the marshal a party in this court, this court is without jurisdiction to determine the correctness of the judgment involving the-traverse of service. McFall v. Griffin, 84 Ga. App. 606 (2) (66 S. E. 2d, 646); Stewart v. Stewart, 208 Ga. 83 (65 S. E. 2d, 151).

2. There was no evidence to support the other grounds of the motion to set aside the judgment and the court properly overruled such motion. On rehearing the former judgment of reversal is vacated and a judgment of affirmance is substituted therefor.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C.J., and Worrill, J., concur. W. George Thomas, for plaintiff in error. White, Douglas & Arnold, Hamilton Douglas Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, J.

1. Where a marshal’s return of service is traversed on the ground that the entry of service is not true, and he is made a party to the proceedings, and where the court below finds in favor of the return of service and the traversor excepts to that judgment without making the marshal a party in this court, this court is without jurisdiction to determine the correctness of the judgment involving the-traverse of service. McFall v. Griffin, 84 Ga. App. 606 (2) (66 S. E. 2d, 646); Stewart v. Stewart, 208 Ga. 83 (65 S. E. 2d, 151).

2. There was no evidence to support the other grounds of the motion to set aside the judgment and the court properly overruled such motion. On rehearing the former judgment of reversal is vacated and a judgment of affirmance is substituted therefor.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C.J., and Worrill, J., concur. W. George Thomas, for plaintiff in error. White, Douglas & Arnold, Hamilton Douglas Jr., contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.E.2d 689, 86 Ga. App. 526, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyndale-v-manufacturers-supply-co-gactapp-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack