Tyler Weisman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tyler Weisman v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 2017

Docket5D16-27

StatusPublished

This text of Tyler Weisman v. State (Tyler Weisman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyler Weisman v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TYLER WEISMAN,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-27

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 12, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Donna L. McIntosh, Judge.

William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s decision revoking Tyler Weisman’s probation except as

to the alleged violation of special condition E. As to that special condition, we conclude

the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of a willful violation. As a result, on

remand, the trial court shall strike the finding of a violation of special condition E from the

order of revocation. Because it is clear the trial court would have revoked Mr. Weisman’s probation without considering the alleged violation of special condition E, we affirm. See

Lee v. State, 67 So. 3d 1199, 1201-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF CORRECTED ORDER.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI