Tyler v. Tyler

1914 OK 631, 144 P. 1023, 44 Okla. 411, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 716
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 8, 1914·No. 3727·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

This cause is brought here for the purpose of reversing a judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the evidence. The case-made filed herein fails to show any motion for new trial was filed. The appeal, therefore, under authority of Insurance Company of North America v. Little, 34 Okla. 499, 125 Pac. 1098; Ardmore Oil *412 & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280, 122 Pac. 241; Stump v. Porter, 31 Okla. 157, 120 Pac. 639, and James v. Jackson, 30 Okla. 190, 120 Pac. 288, should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyler v. Tyler, 1914 OK 631, 144 P. 1023, 44 Okla. 411, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 716 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 631 (Tyler v. Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson ex rel. Wilson v. Buie
1958 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Hunt v. Tribune Publishing Co.
1935 OK 551 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Burch v. Gibson
1934 OK 289 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Sac & Fox Oil Co. v. Owens
1928 OK 571 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Johnson v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County
1927 OK 156 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)
Malleck v. Thomas
1925 OK 257 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of Okmulgee
1924 OK 645 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Callander v. Hopkins
1923 OK 25 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co.
1919 OK 365 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Clapper v. Putnam Co.
1916 OK 588 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)