Tyler v. Superior Oil Company
This text of 322 F.2d 479 (Tyler v. Superior Oil Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
322 F.2d 479
Lee H. TYLER and R. E. Crews, Appellants,
v.
The SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, a California corporation,
Ambassador Oil Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, and Apache Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, Appellees.
No. 7320.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 1, 1963.
Before LEWIS, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
This is a companion case to Crews Oil Company v. Superior Oil Company, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 532, the only factual difference being that appellants here are royalty owners and present an additional legal issue by attacking the applicable Oklahoma statutes and the order of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission as unconstitutionally impairing the obligations of a contract in violation of Article I, Sec. 10, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article II, Sec. 15, and Article II, Sec. 7, of the Oklahoma Constitution. We find nothing in the case that suggests a federal constitutional question or brings the issue beyond the scope of Anderson v. Corporation Commission, Okl., 327 P.2d 699, dismissed for want of a federal question. 358 U.S. 642, 79 S. Ct. 536, 3 L. Ed. 2d 567. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Crews Oil Company v. Superior Oil Company, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 532, and cases cited therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 F.2d 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-superior-oil-company-ca10-1963.