Tyler v. State
170 S.W. 280, 75 Tex. Crim. 96, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 432
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 28, 1914·No. No. 3325.·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—This conviction was for passing a forged instrument. Pending the appeal appellant has made his escape from custody. He did not voluntarily return within ten days, nor has he as yet returned, or had not up to the time of making of the affidavit by the sheriff of his escape. The ten days had long since expired before the affidavit was made. Under this showing the appeal will have to be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tyler v. State, 170 S.W. 280, 75 Tex. Crim. 96, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 432 (Tex. 1914).
170 S.W. 280 (Tyler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eckert v. State
623 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)