Tyler v. State
This text of 18 S.W.3d 117 (Tyler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Melvin Leroy Tyler (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 27.26 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his judgment and sentence without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 S.W.3d 117, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 519, 2000 WL 387098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-state-moctapp-2000.