Tyler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tyler v. State

859 So. 2d 628, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18071, 2003 WL 22799506

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 26, 2003

DocketNo. 1D03-1550

StatusPublished

This text of 859 So. 2d 628 (Tyler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyler v. State, 859 So. 2d 628, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18071, 2003 WL 22799506 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vel Tyler petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, contending that the Circuit Court in and for Alachua County has unreasonably delayed disposition of his motion for postconvietion relief. Having now considered the petition and the response filed on behalf of respondent State of Florida, we agree with petitioner. See Bernard v. State, 734 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted and the circuit court is directed to act on the motion within 30 days of issuance of mandate in this proceeding by either acting on the motion or by entering an order which sets an evidentiary hearing to be conducted within a reasonable time after entry of the order.

PETITION GRANTED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI