Tyler v. State

97 So. 573, 210 Ala. 96, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 181
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 24, 1923·No. 6 Div. 942.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court is of the opinion, and so holds, that so much of the argument of the solicitor as was made reversible error by the Court of Appeals should not have reversed the judgment of the trial court under the case of Olden v. State, 176 Ala. 6, 58 South. 307. The certiorari is accordingly awarded, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to said court for further action in conformity with this opinion.

Writ awarded and reversed and remanded.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyler v. State, 97 So. 573, 210 Ala. 96, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 181 (Ala. 1923).

97 So. 573 (Tyler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Embrey v. State
214 So. 2d 567 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
Johnson v. State
133 So. 2d 53 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)
Summers v. State
36 So. 2d 574 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Jones v. State
34 So. 2d 483 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Summers v. State
36 So. 2d 571 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1947)
Grissett v. State
2 So. 2d 399 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)
Davidson v. State
100 So. 641 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Tyler v. State
97 So. 573 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)