Tyler v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Tyler v. Smith

187 S.W. 697, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 778

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 15, 1916

DocketNo. 916.

StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.W. 697 (Tyler v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyler v. Smith, 187 S.W. 697, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 778 (Tex. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, C. J.

This is a motion to affirm on certificate. It shows that the term of the district court of Reeves county convened on the 19th day of November, 1915, and adjourned on the 29th day of December, 1915; that a judgment was entered in the cause in favor of appellee on the 16th day of December, 1915, for $2,572.41, and motion for new trial was overruled December 28, 1915, and appellant gave notice of appeal; that the appeal bond was filed January 18, 1916. The transcript was not filed in this court within 90 days, as provided by article 1608, Vernon's Sayles’ Statutes of Texas, and, in accordance with article 1610 of said statutes, appellee moves this court to affirm.

The motion is granted, and cause affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, C. J.

This is a motion to affirm on certificate. It shows that the term of the district court of Reeves county convened on the 19th day of November, 1915, and adjourned on the 29th day of December, 1915; that a judgment was entered in the cause in favor of appellee on the 16th day of December, 1915, for $2,572.41, and motion for new trial was overruled December 28, 1915, and appellant gave notice of appeal; that the appeal bond was filed January 18, 1916. The transcript was not filed in this court within 90 days, as provided by article 1608, Vernon's Sayles’ Statutes of Texas, and, in accordance with article 1610 of said statutes, appellee moves this court to affirm.

The motion is granted, and cause affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 S.W. 697, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-smith-texapp-1916.