Tyler v. Painter

16 Fla. 144
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Me. Justice Westcott

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Fourth Judicial Circuit, rendered in a habeas corpus proceeding.

An appeal is not the method by which such proceedings are reviewed in this court. Under the statute regulating the subject a writ of error is the exclusive remedy. Thomp. Dig., 529-530. The method of proceeding under that statute is discussed in ex-pcvrte Finch, 15 Fla., 632, and in ex-parte Edwards, 11 Fla., 174. This writ of error is not regulated by the general statute upon the subject of writs of error. Thomp. Dig. 446-7. The practice as to notice and the terms upon which the writ may be granted, are matters of discretion in this court.

There being no appeal from such judgment, the appeal must be and is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyler v. Painter, 16 Fla. 144 (Fla. 1877).

16 Fla. 144 (Tyler v. Painter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deeb v. Gandy
148 So. 540 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Hardie
146 So. 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Carlton v. Johnson
61 Fla. 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Belch v. Manning
55 Fla. 229 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
McIver & Chamberlain v. Marshall
24 Fla. 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1888)