Tyler v. Hyde

24 F. Cas. 468, 2 Blatchf. 399, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 376
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 F. Cas. 468 (Tyler v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyler v. Hyde, 24 F. Cas. 468, 2 Blatchf. 399, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 376 (circtsdny 1852).

Opinion

BETTS, District Judge.

The court will not, on this motion, enter into a consideration of the sufficiency of the plea in point of substance, or inquire whether it is founded upon the rightful decree of the circuit court in Louisiana. It may,' possibly, become necessary for this court to determine, when the proofs -are presented, which decree of that court is the valid one governing the case, should two be certified from it which are in conflict in particulars affecting the merits. The privilege accorded to the defendants to plead over, was subject to no restrictions, and they are entitled under it to interpose any plea which would have been good if put in independently of that leave. The defendants plead at their peril, and their plea, being regular in form, cannot be displaced by motion. The plaintiffs must demur to it or take issue on the facts it sets up.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commissioners of the Sinking Fund v. Buckner
48 F. 533 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 468, 2 Blatchf. 399, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-hyde-circtsdny-1852.