Tyler v. Hodges

Fourth Circuit

Tyler v. Hodges

672 F. App'x 317

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 9, 2017·No. No. 16-7116·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for the appointment of counsel, denying his motion to amend his complaint, and accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tyler v. Hodges, No. 4:16-cv-01151-MGL (D.S.C. July 27 & Aug. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for the appointment of counsel, denying his motion to amend his complaint, and accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tyler v. Hodges, No. 4:16-cv-01151-MGL (D.S.C. July 27 & Aug. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Tyler v. Hodges, 672 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

672 F. App'x 317 (Tyler v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related