Tyler v. Healey

51 Cal. 191
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 4421·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

When the defendant had partially examined one of his witnesses, he desired to recall him for further examination on matters material to the issue, and asked the leave of the court to recall him for that purpose. ■ On the objection of plaintiff, the court refused to permit the witness to be re[193]*193called, on the ground that “the court has no discretion (to permit it) against the objection of the plaintiff.” The ruling is too clearly erroneous to merit discussion.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a. new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyler v. Healey, 51 Cal. 191 (Cal. 1875).

51 Cal. 191 (Tyler v. Healey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beirne v. Modern National Reserve
111 P. 1032 (Montana Supreme Court, 1910)
Schaetzel v. City of Huron
60 N.W. 741 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)