Tyler v. Harrah's Council Bluffs Casino
This text of 103 F. App'x 921 (Tyler v. Harrah's Council Bluffs Casino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Billy Roy Tyler appeals the district court’s preserviee dismissal without prejudice of Tyler’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Tyler, who is African-American, alleged he appeared at Harrah’s Casino in July 2003 to apply for a job and was told he must apply online; a “glitch in [the] program ... prevented [him] from applying”; he did not see any African-Americans working at the casino; and he was thus the victim of job discrimination.
We grant Tyler leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude preservice dismissal was inappropriate because Tyler’s complaint, liberally construed, satisfied federal *922 pleading requirements by providing Harrah’s Casino notice of Tyler’s claim of race-based discrimination in its employment-application process. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A, 534 U.S. 506, 514-15, 122 S.Ct. 992, 152 L.Ed.2d 1 (2002); Smith v. St. Bernards Reg’l Med. Ctr., 19 F.3d 1254, 1255 (8th Cir.1994).
Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 F. App'x 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-harrahs-council-bluffs-casino-ca8-2004.