Tyler v. Great American Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Tyler v. Great American Insurance

210 So. 2d 565, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4993

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 30, 1968

DocketNo. 11002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 So. 2d 565 (Tyler v. Great American Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyler v. Great American Insurance, 210 So. 2d 565, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4993 (La. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PRICE, Judge.

This case was consolidated with American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. Tyler et al., 210 So.2d 561, this day decided by this Court.

Plaintiff, Martha L. Tyler, brought suit for personal injuries, property damage and medical expenses against C. C. Nash and his liability insurer, Great American Insurance Company of New York. These injuries are alleged to have occurred as a result of the vehicular collision described in the companion case heretofore referred to. In that case this Court found that the [566]*566accident resulted solely from the negligence of Martha L. Tyler, the plaintiff in this case.

For the reasons given in the companion case of American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. Tyler, et al., the judgment of the district court rejecting the demands of plaintiff is hereby affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRICE, Judge.

This case was consolidated with American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. Tyler et al., 210 So.2d 561, this day decided by this Court.

Plaintiff, Martha L. Tyler, brought suit for personal injuries, property damage and medical expenses against C. C. Nash and his liability insurer, Great American Insurance Company of New York. These injuries are alleged to have occurred as a result of the vehicular collision described in the companion case heretofore referred to. In that case this Court found that the [566]*566accident resulted solely from the negligence of Martha L. Tyler, the plaintiff in this case.

For the reasons given in the companion case of American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. Tyler, et al., the judgment of the district court rejecting the demands of plaintiff is hereby affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 So. 2d 565, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-great-american-insurance-lactapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack