Tyler v. Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n

55 A. 714, 20 Del. 281, 4 Penne. 281, 1903 Del. LEXIS 19
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedMarch 6, 1903
DocketNo. 11
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A. 714 (Tyler v. Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyler v. Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n, 55 A. 714, 20 Del. 281, 4 Penne. 281, 1903 Del. LEXIS 19 (Del. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

Lobe, C. J.:

—The question is whether it was regular to issue the three writs. Counsel for defendant concedes that in three different suits in this county process might issue to the sheriffs of New Castle County, Kent County and Sussex County. The effect would be the same whether there were three writs issued, one to the sheriff of each county, in one suit or in three separate suits. We are only dealing with the question whether we have the right to issue these three writs in one suit. What may be done under them and what risks are taken are entirely different matters.

The motion to quash the writs of attachment is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A. 714, 20 Del. 281, 4 Penne. 281, 1903 Del. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-fidelity-building-loan-assn-delsuperct-1903.