Tyler v. Decker

10 Cal. 435
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 435 (Tyler v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyler v. Decker, 10 Cal. 435 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J., concurring.

Defendants, in December, 1857, purchased a lot at sheriff's sale. Soon after, they entered into possession and erected certain buildings, which remained on the lot until the 25th of May, 1858, when they were removed by defendants.

On the 25th of May, 1858, the defendants in execution sold the premises to plaintiff, and a day or two afterwards, tendered to defendants in this action the money necessary to redeem the lot, which was accepted by them.

This suit was instituted to recover the value of the buildings removed by defendants, previous to the redemption. The Court below entered a judgment of nonsuit, from which plaintiff appeals.

There was no error in the judgment. It nowhere appears in the record that the buildings in question were ever annexed to the soil. They appear to have been mere temporary structures placed upon the lot by the party in possession, and removed by him before his possession terminated.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooke v. Cooper
22 P. 945 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-decker-cal-1858.