Tyler v. City Council of Huntington Park

276 P. 355, 97 Cal. App. 724, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 745
California Court of Appeal·Decided March 22, 1929·No. Docket No. 6326.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appellants petitioned the superior court for a writ of review as to certain actions of the City Council of the City of Huntington Park. A demurrer to the petition was interposed and the court sustained it without leave to amend. Defendants also filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding and the court granted the motion and ordered the cause dismissed. [1] This attempted appeal is from the ruling of the court on the demurrer alone, and it must be dismissed, as an order on demurrer is not appealable. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.) *Page 725 Even if this were not true, nothing could be gained by our consideration of the appeal, for the order of dismissal would remain in full force and effect.

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyler v. City Council of Huntington Park, 276 P. 355, 97 Cal. App. 724, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 745 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

276 P. 355 (Tyler v. City Council of Huntington Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Adamson
201 P.2d 537 (California Supreme Court, 1949)
Percy v. Allen
6 P.2d 88 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)