Tyler v. Anthony
This text of 2 Foster 16 (Tyler v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The record returns that on the proper day of hearing the parties did not appear! There is nothing stated from which it can be reasonably inferred that the plaintiff was represented by an agent or by witnesses. The duty of the justice was then to enter a judgment of non suit, and not upon the mere statement of the amount, and the examination of it, to enter judgment by default against the defendant. We refer to our opinion filed in the case of M’Cowan v. Ward, 1 Luz. Legal Observer, 196, as substantially agreeing with this cause, and showing the grounds upon which we are compelled to reverse the judgment. The justice had no jurisdiction to allow the entry of such a judgment.
Proceedings reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Foster 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-v-anthony-pactcomplluzern-1873.