Tyler James Kirkpatrick v. the State of Texas
This text of Tyler James Kirkpatrick v. the State of Texas (Tyler James Kirkpatrick v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-21-00171-CR No. 10-21-00172-CR
TYLER JAMES KIRKPATRICK, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2019-476-C1 & 2019-594-C1
ABATEMENT ORDER
On July 16, 2021, retained counsel for appellant, Tyler James Kirkpatrick, filed
notices of appeal in appellate cause numbers 10-21-00171-CR and 10-21-00172-CR.
Thereafter, on August 17, 2021, the Clerk’s Record and the Reporter’s Record were both
filed. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a), appellant’s briefs in these
matters were due thirty days from August 17, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). To date,
we have not received a brief in either appellate cause number. On October 21, 2021, this Court informed appellant’s retained counsel that
appellant’s briefs were late.1 In our October 21, 2021 letter, we informed counsel that, if
a brief or satisfactory response is not filed in each appellate cause number, we will abate
this appeal and order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing pursuant to Texas
Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and 38.8(b)(3). See id. at R. 38.8(b)(2)-(3). We have
not received a response to our October 21, 2021 notice.
Because a brief or satisfactory response has not been filed in either appellate cause
number within fourteen days of our October 21, 2021 notice, we abate and remand these
appeals to the trial court to conduct any necessary hearings within twenty-days of the
date of this order, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and
(3). See id. at R. 38.8(b)(2)-(3).
The Supplemental Clerk’s and Reporter’s Records required by rule, if any, are
ordered to be filed within thirty-five days of the date of this Order. See id. at R. 38.8(b)(2)-
(3).
PER CURIAM
1The record also reflects that appellant has not filed a docketing statement in either appeal. On August 10 and 11, 2021, we informed appellant’s retained counsel of the failure to timely file a docketing statement in both appeals. We have not received a response to our August 10 and 11, 2021 notices.
Kirkpatrick v. State Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeals abated Order issued and filed November 18, 2021 Do not publish [CRPM] [RWR]
Kirkpatrick v. State Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tyler James Kirkpatrick v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-james-kirkpatrick-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.