Tyler Farmer v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 30, 2020
Docket13-20-00107-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Tyler Farmer v. State (Tyler Farmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyler Farmer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-20-00107-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TYLER FARMER, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On Appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s counsel, Christopher Dorsey, filed a motion to withdraw as appointed

attorney. According to the motion, good cause exists for him to withdraw because he

started working for San Patricio County on December 16, 2020.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

appointment of counsel may be necessary, an appellate court should abate the

proceeding to the trial court for determination of this issue. Accordingly, we CARRY the

motion, ABATE the appeal, and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant has abandoned his

appeal; if not, the trial court shall determine whether appellant is entitled to court-

appointed counsel. If the trial court determines new counsel should be appointed, the

name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. If the trial court

determines appellant has abandoned this appeal and/or is not entitled to court-

appointment counsel, it shall issue such findings. The trial court shall further cause its

findings and/or order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the

Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIUM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 30th day of December, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. State
176 S.W.3d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tyler Farmer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyler-farmer-v-state-texapp-2020.