Tygart Valley Total Care Clinic v. Division of Corrections

23 Ct. Cl. 14
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedAugust 24, 1999
DocketCC-99-195
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Ct. Cl. 14 (Tygart Valley Total Care Clinic v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tygart Valley Total Care Clinic v. Division of Corrections, 23 Ct. Cl. 14 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks $625.00 for medical services rendered to an inmate in Pruntytown Correctional Center, a facility of the respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in respondent’s appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay that portion of the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct.Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Airkem Sales & Service v. Department of Mental Health
8 Ct. Cl. 180 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Ct. Cl. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tygart-valley-total-care-clinic-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-1999.