Tygart Valley Total Care Clinic v. Division of Corrections
This text of 23 Ct. Cl. 14 (Tygart Valley Total Care Clinic v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.
Claimant seeks $625.00 for medical services rendered to an inmate in Pruntytown Correctional Center, a facility of the respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in respondent’s appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay that portion of the claim.
While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct.Cl. 180 (1971).
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ct. Cl. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tygart-valley-total-care-clinic-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-1999.