Twyman v. Roell

162 So. 343, 120 Fla. 141
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 162 So. 343 (Twyman v. Roell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Twyman v. Roell, 162 So. 343, 120 Fla. 141 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

*142 Pee Curiam.

This case is before the Court on motion to dismiss as frivolous under Sections 4639 C. G. L., 2920 R. G. S., 4965 C. G. L., 3173 R. G. S., the briefs of all parties being and before the Court for consideration.

An examination of the briefs does not confirm the contention of the appellees that the appeal is wholly devoid of merit, as charged in the motion to dismiss, nor do we feel that the rule of Gill v. Smith, 119 Fla. 293, 161 Sou. Rep. 282 ( 2nd headnote), should be applied in the circumstances of the controversy here disclosed.

Therefore the motion to dismiss the appeal as frivolous is denied and the cause ordered to stand on the docket for disposition in due course.

Motion to dismiss appeal as frivolous denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Pickard
269 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Ex parte Sams
67 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 343, 120 Fla. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twyman-v-roell-fla-1935.