Twyman v. Milk Bottlers Federation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Twyman v. Milk Bottlers Federation

267 A.D. 918, 47 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D. 918 (Twyman v. Milk Bottlers Federation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Twyman v. Milk Bottlers Federation, 267 A.D. 918, 47 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for unpaid minimum wages and unpaid compensation for overtime alleged to be due under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, §§ 201-219), plaintiffs appeal, by permission of this court, from an order of the Appellate Term which affirmed a judgment of the City Court, Kings County, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. We find that the business of the defendant is that of a service establishment and that as such it is within the exception provided for in the second clause of subdivision (a) of section 13 of the statute [U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 213, subd. (a), el. (2)]. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ. [180 Misc. 229, 232; 180 Misc. 788.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for unpaid minimum wages and unpaid compensation for overtime alleged to be due under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, §§ 201-219), plaintiffs appeal, by permission of this court, from an order of the Appellate Term which affirmed a judgment of the City Court, Kings County, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. We find that the business of the defendant is that of a service establishment and that as such it is within the exception provided for in the second clause of subdivision (a) of section 13 of the statute [U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 213, subd. (a), el. (2)]. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ. [180 Misc. 229, 232; 180 Misc. 788.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D. 918, 47 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twyman-v-milk-bottlers-federation-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack