Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 181 A.3d 467
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 23, 2018·No. 387 and 436 C.D. 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Township of Neshannock, : CASES CONSOLIDATED Appellant : : v. : No. 387 C.D. 2017 : Kirila Contractors, Inc. and Fidelity : and Deposit Company of Maryland, : and Kirila Contractors, Inc., Hatch, : Mott MacDonald and Hatch Mott : MacDonald, LLC, and Hatch Mott : MacDonald T&T, Inc., both t/d/b/a : Hatch Mott MacDonald :

Township of Neshannock : : v. : No. 436 C.D. 2017 : Kirila Contractors, Inc. and : Fidelity and Deposit Company : of Maryland, : Appellants :

ORDER

NOW, April 23, 2018, having considered designated appellant’s application for reargument and designated appellee Kirila Contractors, Inc.’s answer in response thereto, the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc., (Pa. Ct. App. 2018).

Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc. (Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.