Twomey v. J.G.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Twomey v. J.G.

383 N.W.2d 53, 1986 N.D. LEXIS 290

North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 1986·No. Civ. No. 11002·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court determined that A.G. was an “unruly child” under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-02 for habitual truancy because she was kept from school for a home learning program supervised by her parents. Our recent decision, In the Interest of C.S., 382 N.W.2d 381 (N.D.1986), held that a child cannot be found “unruly” in these circumstances. That decision is controlling and dispositive. Reversed.

ERICKSTAD, C.J., and MESCHKE, LEVINE, VANDEWALLE and GIERKE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court determined that A.G. was an “unruly child” under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-02 for habitual truancy because she was kept from school for a home learning program supervised by her parents. Our recent decision, In the Interest of C.S., 382 N.W.2d 381 (N.D.1986), held that a child cannot be found “unruly” in these circumstances. That decision is controlling and dispositive. Reversed.

ERICKSTAD, C.J., and MESCHKE, LEVINE, VANDEWALLE and GIERKE, JJ., concur.

Twomey v. J.G., 383 N.W.2d 53, 1986 N.D. LEXIS 290 (N.D. 1986).

Pincite

383 N.W.2d 53 (Twomey v. J.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related