Twohy v. Doran

251 U.S. 541, 40 S. Ct. 177, 64 L. Ed. 405, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1076
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 5, 1920
DocketNo. 251
StatusPublished

This text of 251 U.S. 541 (Twohy v. Doran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Twohy v. Doran, 251 U.S. 541, 40 S. Ct. 177, 64 L. Ed. 405, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1076 (1920).

Opinion

Per Cyriam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. George Mason Dillard for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. D. Hank, Jr., and John R. Saunders iot defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 U.S. 541, 40 S. Ct. 177, 64 L. Ed. 405, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twohy-v-doran-scotus-1920.