Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields

293 A.D.2d 740, 741 N.Y.S.2d 432, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shifrin, R.), dated September 14, 2000, which, af[741] ter a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $24,077.15.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff established a prima facie case by submitting proof of the note and the defendant’s default (see J.L.B. Equities v Mind Over Money, 261 AD2d 510; RVC Assoc. v Farkas, 261 AD2d 383; Bella Food Corp. v Luigi’s Italian Deli, 243 AD2d 592; Colonial Commercial Corp. v Breskel Assoc., 238 AD2d 539). The defendant failed to establish the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement (see Arbisser v Gelbelman, 286 AD2d 693, 694; National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 9; Parkway Woods v Petco Enters., 201 AD2d 713; Dunkin’ Donuts v HWT Assoc., 181 AD2d 711).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shifrin, R.), dated September 14, 2000, which, af[741] ter a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $24,077.15.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff established a prima facie case by submitting proof of the note and the defendant’s default (see J.L.B. Equities v Mind Over Money, 261 AD2d 510; RVC Assoc. v Farkas, 261 AD2d 383; Bella Food Corp. v Luigi’s Italian Deli, 243 AD2d 592; Colonial Commercial Corp. v Breskel Assoc., 238 AD2d 539). The defendant failed to establish the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement (see Arbisser v Gelbelman, 286 AD2d 693, 694; National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 9; Parkway Woods v Petco Enters., 201 AD2d 713; Dunkin’ Donuts v HWT Assoc., 181 AD2d 711).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields, 293 A.D.2d 740, 741 N.Y.S.2d 432, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

293 A.D.2d 740 (Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related