Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields

293 A.D.2d 740, 741 N.Y.S.2d 432, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 740 (Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Two Lincoln Advisory Services, Inc. v. Shields, 293 A.D.2d 740, 741 N.Y.S.2d 432, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shifrin, R.), dated September 14, 2000, which, af[741]*741ter a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $24,077.15.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff established a prima facie case by submitting proof of the note and the defendant’s default (see J.L.B. Equities v Mind Over Money, 261 AD2d 510; RVC Assoc. v Farkas, 261 AD2d 383; Bella Food Corp. v Luigi’s Italian Deli, 243 AD2d 592; Colonial Commercial Corp. v Breskel Assoc., 238 AD2d 539). The defendant failed to establish the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement (see Arbisser v Gelbelman, 286 AD2d 693, 694; National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 9; Parkway Woods v Petco Enters., 201 AD2d 713; Dunkin’ Donuts v HWT Assoc., 181 AD2d 711).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shifrin, R.), dated September 14, 2000, which, af[741]*741ter a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $24,077.15.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff established a prima facie case by submitting proof of the note and the defendant’s default (see J.L.B. Equities v Mind Over Money, 261 AD2d 510; RVC Assoc. v Farkas, 261 AD2d 383; Bella Food Corp. v Luigi’s Italian Deli, 243 AD2d 592; Colonial Commercial Corp. v Breskel Assoc., 238 AD2d 539). The defendant failed to establish the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement (see Arbisser v Gelbelman, 286 AD2d 693, 694; National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 9; Parkway Woods v Petco Enters., 201 AD2d 713; Dunkin’ Donuts v HWT Assoc., 181 AD2d 711).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 740, 741 N.Y.S.2d 432, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/two-lincoln-advisory-services-inc-v-shields-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack