Two Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty ($288,940.00) Dollars in Currency v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Two Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty ($288,940.00) Dollars in Currency v. State

DecidedOctober 8, 2009

Docket13-09-00407-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Two Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty ($288,940.00) Dollars in Currency v. State (Two Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty ($288,940.00) Dollars in Currency v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Two Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty ($288,940.00) Dollars in Currency v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00407-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-EIGHT THOUSAND

NINE HUNDRED FORTY ($288,940.00)

DOLLARS IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion asking the Court to dismiss this appeal. According to the motion, the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. They ask this Court to render judgment effectuating the parties' agreement, or in the alternative, set aside the trial court's judgment without regards to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

The parties' motion to set aside the trial court's judgment and remand the case to the trial court is GRANTED. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 8th day of October, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-09-00407-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-EIGHT THOUSAND

NINE HUNDRED FORTY ($288,940.00)

DOLLARS IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion asking the Court to dismiss this appeal. According to the motion, the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. They ask this Court to render judgment effectuating the parties' agreement, or in the alternative, set aside the trial court's judgment without regards to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

The parties' motion to set aside the trial court's judgment and remand the case to the trial court is GRANTED. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 8th day of October, 2009.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Two Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty ($288,940.00) Dollars in Currency v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/two-hundred-eighty-eight-thousand-nine-hundred-for-texapp-2009.