Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley

273 F.2d 954
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 23, 1959
DocketNo. 13096
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 273 F.2d 954 (Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley, 273 F.2d 954 (3d Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in this case have taken the position that they may appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States from an adverse decision by a three-judge court on the issue of the constitutionality of the statute and simultaneously appeal [955]*955to the Court of Appeals on the issue of discriminatory enforcement of the statute. We think there is no basis for the allowance of a split appeal in this fashion. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal to this Court for want of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1253,1291.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of Rudolf Wiechert
370 F.2d 927 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1967)
Wolf v. Boyd
287 F.2d 520 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 F.2d 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/two-guys-from-harrison-allentown-inc-v-mcginley-ca3-1959.